// methodology
How we review.
Every creator on this site gets the same four sub-scores, averaged into one rating out of ten. Featured placements and comparison-guide order are chosen separately from these scores. Here's the rubric.
01
Engagement
Do the DMs feel human? We look at response quality and personalisation, replies that reference the actual conversation score high; copy-paste mass messages score low.
02
Consistency
Posting rhythm over time. A page that posts daily for months beats one that bursts for a week and vanishes. We weight sustained cadence, not launch-week energy.
03
Value
What you actually get for the price: free-page honesty, whether customs are delivered as promised, and whether pricing is straightforward or a maze of upsells.
04
Authenticity
Is it really them? We weigh signals that the creator personally runs the page and chats, versus agency-run accounts, chatter teams, or AI replies.
Scoring. Each sub-score runs 0,10; the overall rating is their average, rounded to one decimal. Ratings move when pages change, a creator who stops posting or hands DMs to a team loses points on the next refresh.
Refresh cadence. Top-rated and featured pages are re-checked most often; the wider directory is refreshed on a rolling basis. Every review page shows the same rubric, so scores are comparable across the whole site.
Featured placements. Featured sections and comparison guides help readers explore profiles by interest. Guide order is separate from the ratings displayed on individual profiles.
Corrections. Spot something wrong, a dead page, a changed price, a rating that no longer fits? Tell us via the contact details on our About page and we'll re-check it.